Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Victoria Mboko vs Madison Sieg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mboko vs Sieg analysis and find out who is favored!
Victoria Mboko vs Madison Sieg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Mboko 1 - 0 Sieg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mboko has won 47.08% of points on their second serve, while Sieg has won 44.6%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mboko, in recent form, has won 62.06% of their opponent's second serve points, while Sieg has won 52.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.39% and 40.18% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mboko has saved 56.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sieg has saved 51.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mboko has won 72.5% of matches played (W/L 29/ 11), with Sieg winning 56.72% (W/L 38/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mboko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 21/ 9), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13). Sieg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 47/ 38).
- Player level: In the last year, Mboko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.5% of matches (W/L 29/ 11), where as Sieg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.58% of matches (W/L 38/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mboko winning 1 times and Sieg being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mboko winning 2 and Sieg winning 0. The last match between Mboko and Sieg was at the W25 Saskatoon, 24-07-2022, Final, Hard with Victoria Mboko getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mboko and Sieg have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mboko winning 0 times and Sieg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mboko winning 0, and Sieg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mboko has played against opponents with an average rank of 285.38 while Sieg has played against players with an average rank of 284.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mboko has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sieg has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mboko has converted 49.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sieg has converted 53.89% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
308
Rank
308
High
17
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
312
Rank
312
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
65% (49-26)
Career Total W/L
56% (79-61)
71% (10-4)
YTD W/L
44% (11-14)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Victoria Mboko | Madison Sieg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:0 | 1:2:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (30/46) | 45% (21/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (20/30) | 52% (11/21) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (9/16) | 27% (7/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 62% (29/47) | 37% (17/46) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Victoria Mboko
Player
Madison Sieg
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Victoria Mboko | Madison Sieg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (10/4) | 44% (11/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 67% (22/11) | 44% (24/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 58% (163/118) | 47% (237/266) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 25% (2/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (9/3) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.08 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.31 |
| DFs Total | 59 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:8 | 1:50:2 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 279.21 | 264.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (554/879) | 66% (1121/1686) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (363/554) | 56% (630/1121) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (153/325) | 45% (252/565) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (66/133) | 54% (97/180) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (454/925) | 45% (700/1562) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 71% (10/4) | 46% (11/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (10/14) | 42% (10/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (3/5) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (9/9) | 91% (11/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (9/0) | 9% (11/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 7% (14/1) |
Victoria Mboko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Victoria Mboko
83%
(
74 of
89)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
59%
(
44 of
74)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
46%
(
41 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Maya Joint
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
50%
(
45 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
59%
(
48 of
81)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
26 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Gergana Topalova
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Ana Grubor
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Victoria Mboko
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
83
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Angela Fita Boluda
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Carlota Martinez Cirez
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
70%
(
19 of
27)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
45
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Nina Vargova
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mariia Tkacheva
Player
Madison Sieg
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gergana Topalova
Player
Madison Sieg
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
12%
(
3 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Daria Yesypchuk
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
86%
(
44 of
51)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Merel Hoedt
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
23 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hikaru Sato
Player
Madison Sieg
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
79%
(
75 of
95)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
50%
(
27 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
108
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(6) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Jaquelyn Ogunwale
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johanne Svendsen
Player
Madison Sieg
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
60 of
82)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
48%
(
32 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
44 of
82)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Elena-Teodora Cadar
67%
(
46 of
69)
1st Serve %
87%
(
75 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
82
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Madison Sieg
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ana Candiotto
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mboko Vs Sieg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Madison Sieg
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
